19
Report on the activities of Mostostal Warszawa S.A. for 2023
contract, for reasons beyond the control of the plaintiffs, there were changes in the scope and shape of the investment,
resulting in additional costs. On 10.10.2016 the court awarded the plaintiffs the amount of PLN 7,142 thousand with interest
from 3.08.2010. It dismissed the claim to the remaining extent. The plaintiffs appealed against the above judgment. On 8
November 2018 the Court of Appeal in Warsaw amended the judgment of the Court of First Instance in such a way that it
dismissed the claim as to the amount of PLN 6,085 thousand. As a consequence of the judgment, the judgment of the
Court of First Instance became final as regards the amount of PLN 1,057 thousand together with due interest.
On 15.02.2019 Mostostal Warszawa S.A. filed a cassation appeal against the judgment of the Court of Appeal.
On 8.11.2019 the Supreme Court accepted the complaint for examination. In a judgment of 30.03.2021 the Supreme Court
overturned the judgment of the Court of Appeal in its entirety and referred the case back to the Court of Appeal.
On 26.05.2022 the Court of Appeal amended the judgment and dismissed the claim in its entirety. Mostostal Warszawa
S.A. filed a cassation appeal against this judgment. The Company wrote off the assets related to this case in 2022.
d) State Treasury General Director for National Roads and Motorways (Respondent)
Date of action 30.05.2012.
Value of the dispute PLN 194,196 thousand
Mostostal Warszawa S.A., together with the consortium member, filed a statement of claim with the Regional Court in
Warsaw against the Respondent for the shaping of the legal relationship by amending the content of agreement no.
2811/3/2010 of 26.02.2010 on the performance of works consisting in the construction of the A-4 Tarnów-Rzeszów
motorway on the section from the Rzeszów Central interchange to the Rzeszów Wschód interchange, km. approx. 574+300
to approx. 581+250 by increasing the remuneration to PLN 194,196 thousand gross (after several updates), and (ii) the
claimed payment of the due remuneration deducted as a contractual penalty - to PLN 13,244 thousand. As a result of the
partial judgment of the Court of Appeal of 30.04.2021, the amount of PLN 13,244 thousand with interest in the amount of
PLN 9,822 thousand was awarded to the Company. The judgment is final and has been paid by the Respondent. With
regard to the remaining amount (i.e. PLN 194,196 thousand), proceedings in the second instance are pending. Part of the
amounts claimed in court is presented by the Company in assets from the performance of construction contracts.
e) State Treasury General Director for National Roads and Motorways – GDDKiA (Respondent)
Date of action 02.07.2013.
Value of the dispute PLN 25,537 thousand
Mostostal Warszawa S.A., together with a consortium member, filed a statement of claim with the Regional Court in
Warsaw against the Respondent for shaping the legal relationship by amending the content of contract No.
210/RK/110/2009/2010 of 1.09.2010 for the performance of works consisting in the extension of road S-7 to the parameters
of a dual carriageway on the section of Kielce bypass, Kielce (DK 73 Wiśniówka junction) - Chęciny (Chęciny junction) by
increasing the remuneration by the gross amount of PLN 25,537 thousand due to an extraordinary increase in the prices
of liquid fuels, asphalts and steel. A court expert opinion was drawn up in the case. The District Court, in a judgment of
22.12.2020, increased the remuneration of Mostostal Warszawa and Acciona by PLN 13,580 thousand. The Company
filed an appeal on 18.03.2021. The claim was dismissed in its entirety by the Court of Appeal on 18.03.2022. The Company
filed a cassation appeal. The Supreme Court overturned the judgment unfavourable to the Company and referred the case
back to the Court of Appeal in Warsaw. The Company wrote off the assets related to this case in 2022.
f) Lublin Oncology Centre (Respondent)
Date of action 03.10.2014.
Value of dispute: PLN 32,461 thousand
In a lawsuit brought against the Respondent, Mostostal Warszawa S.A., together with its consortium members, is pursuing
claims for payment in connection with the construction of the Lublin Oncology Centre. The case is pending before the
Regional Court in Lublin. The aforementioned lawsuit amount consists of claims for: (i) payment for works undisputedly
performed, (ii) interest for delays in payments during the course of the contract, (iii) reimbursement of improperly calculated
and deducted contractual penalties, (iv) other claims in which the plaintiffs seek payment for materials purchased and left
to be built, costs of maintaining guarantees and lost profits. In the present lawsuit, the Respondent filed a counterclaim in
which it demands payment from the Claimant of a total amount of PLN 27,072 thousand. Part of the amount claimed in
court is presented by the Company in the item of trade and other receivables in the group of overdue receivables for which
no revaluation allowances were created and in assets from the performance of construction contracts. On 17.02.2020,
an expert opinion (WACETOB) was prepared, according to which the Ordering Party had no grounds for terminating
the contract and at the same time confirmed the amount of Mostostal's claims in the amount of PLN 26,200 thousand.
The parties received a supplementary opinion and responded to it in writing. Another supplementary opinion responding
to the parties' questions was received.
g) Agencja Rozwoju Miasta S.A. (City Development Agency) (Respondent)
Date of action 28.04.2017.
Value of the dispute PLN 23,017 thousand
Mostostal Warszawa S.A. filed a counterclaim against the Respondent for payment of an amount for additional works
related to the construction of the "Czyżyny" entertainment and sports hall in Kraków. Based on expert opinions in its
possession, part of the amount claimed in court is presented by the Company in the item of trade and other receivables in
the group of overdue receivables for which no revaluation allowances were created and in assets from the performance of
construction contracts. Due to the failure to reach an agreement in mediation, the case continues before the court.